Where London eats safely

The share of rated premises scoring top marks, borough by borough.

See it on the map →Embed this viewUpdated 31 Jul

Data access

Use the machine-readable JSON record or the flattened CSV download or the compact Markdown version.

Preview the latest 30 observations
SeriesPeriod or categoryValueUnit
ValueKensington and Chelsea87.9103% rated 5
ValueMerton81.3135% rated 5
ValueGreenwich79.4533% rated 5
ValueHaringey78.0978% rated 5
ValueBromley77.6898% rated 5
ValueWandsworth77.6359% rated 5
ValueHammersmith and Fulham77.551% rated 5
ValueSutton74.4463% rated 5
ValueBrent74.3383% rated 5
ValueHounslow72.8402% rated 5
ValueTower Hamlets72.2339% rated 5
ValueSouthwark71.8164% rated 5
ValueHavering71.784% rated 5
ValueBexley70.9439% rated 5
ValueWestminster70.0819% rated 5
ValueHackney67.3864% rated 5
ValueRedbridge66.33% rated 5
ValueCroydon64.4001% rated 5
ValueIslington63.9901% rated 5
ValueHillingdon63.9124% rated 5
ValueLewisham62.668% rated 5
ValueLambeth61.5704% rated 5
ValueHarrow61.2717% rated 5
ValueBarnet60.9766% rated 5
ValueEnfield59.0481% rated 5
ValueCamden58.834% rated 5
ValueEaling58.0782% rated 5
ValueBarking and Dagenham55.658% rated 5
ValueWaltham Forest50.9941% rated 5
ValueNewham49.0969% rated 5

Methodology

Every rated premises in each London borough from the Food Standards Agency register, counted locally because the API advertises a rating filter and ignores it. Only numerically rated premises are counted: awaiting-inspection and exempt are roughly a fifth of the register and would penalise a borough for having a backlog rather than for being dirtier.

Provenance

Cadence
monthly
Engine
comparison

Keep going